Electrical engineering open-source software providing a user-friendly, unified, flexible simulation framework for the multiphysic design and optimization of electrical machines and drives
This issue mainly aims at removing the ambiguity of calling "tangential component" the component along the second axis in the cylindrical coordinate system. In fact there is no ambiguity in 2D because there is only one tangent to radial direction, so the tangential direction is necessarily the one which is perpendicular to radial direction. However in 3D, the "tangential" term refers to a plane defined by its normal, and so in this case this plane contains an infinity of tangential directions.
Besides, it is the opportunity to freeze the name of all directions as a convention so we only use one term in every script and plot legend. Here are the main different terms I found in the litterature:
for the first axis: radial direction (I think this one gets everyone to agree).
for the second axis: circumferential direction / azimuthal direction
for the third axis: axial direction / longitudinal direction
On my side I'd rather use "circumferential" and "axial", because "azimuthal" makes more sense to me in spherical coordinates, and axial is clearer and shorter than "longitudinal".
What do you think about this naming convention ?
Once we agree on a convention, we can perform the renaming inside a Pyleecan branch.
This renaming would imply a similar renaming in SciDataTool as well. We could use the key words "wavenumber_circ" and "wavenumber_axial" for the fft axes. What do you think?
Hello,
This issue mainly aims at removing the ambiguity of calling "tangential component" the component along the second axis in the cylindrical coordinate system. In fact there is no ambiguity in 2D because there is only one tangent to radial direction, so the tangential direction is necessarily the one which is perpendicular to radial direction. However in 3D, the "tangential" term refers to a plane defined by its normal, and so in this case this plane contains an infinity of tangential directions.
Besides, it is the opportunity to freeze the name of all directions as a convention so we only use one term in every script and plot legend. Here are the main different terms I found in the litterature:
On my side I'd rather use "circumferential" and "axial", because "azimuthal" makes more sense to me in spherical coordinates, and axial is clearer and shorter than "longitudinal".
What do you think about this naming convention ?
Once we agree on a convention, we can perform the renaming inside a Pyleecan branch.
Best regards, Emile