STAR Voting is an upgrade to our current way of voting that allows voters to score candidates from 0 to 5. Ultimately, STAR Voting elects candidates who better represent the whole of the electorate. We are building a site that lets everyone from individuals to organizations use STAR Voting to host simple polls or run secure elections.
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
19
stars
22
forks
source link
Add a "contributions welcome" message somewhere on the site #289
I think it would be nice if we could highlight somewhere on the website that we're open to having more collaborators on the project, and pull requests are welcome.
Examples
I looked at some other open source projects for reference. There seems to be a spectrum of process when it comes to collaborators
Playful / community focused projects
https://mermaid.js.org/ : Most of the page is dedicated to their contributors, and there's a "Join the community" call to action on the bottom
https://godotengine.org/ : Nothing about contributions on the main page, but they do have a governance link in the footer which includes contribution information
After looking through examples, I don't think we need to feature this too much in the footer. We'll want to lean more on the side of the serious/bigger projects because we want to signal confidence that there's an organization behind this project rather than a scattered community.
We'll probably have sections later covering governance and contribution guidelines (possibly on the about page), but these don't need to be featured super prominently in the footer. I think keycloak is the closest to where I'm leaning (both in terms of website structure, and in the way their community page is written)
The suggestion
I think it would be nice if we could highlight somewhere on the website that we're open to having more collaborators on the project, and pull requests are welcome.
Examples
I looked at some other open source projects for reference. There seems to be a spectrum of process when it comes to collaborators
Playful / community focused projects
Middle ground
More serious projects
My conclusion
After looking through examples, I don't think we need to feature this too much in the footer. We'll want to lean more on the side of the serious/bigger projects because we want to signal confidence that there's an organization behind this project rather than a scattered community.
We'll probably have sections later covering governance and contribution guidelines (possibly on the about page), but these don't need to be featured super prominently in the footer. I think keycloak is the closest to where I'm leaning (both in terms of website structure, and in the way their community page is written)