Closed dword-design closed 4 years ago
Currently, when querying via e.g. ?fork, the first commit of that branch (or at least not the lastest) is taken when adding a repo to the package. I think it makes more sense to always take the latest one.
Can you give an example? I think the current behavior is taking the latest commit rather than the first.
Never mind, it was the good ol' Yarn cache. There is an open issue about caching git dependencies.
Currently, when querying via e.g. ?fork, the first commit of that branch (or at least not the lastest) is taken when adding a repo to the package. I think it makes more sense to always take the latest one.