LLM-Powered Issue Suggestion

[bbertucc]

Overview

This bountied issue is for the development of our LLM feature.

We've been discussing an LLM integration for a while. I've even created two ChatGPT GPTs to test out ideas. Now, I'm hoping we can deliver our LLM feature to production.

Feature Ideas

The most useful integration with LLMs is to create GitHub tickets from Equalify content. I've been testing creating issues from a single node source and creating issues from a single message with lots of nodes.

Issue from a Single Equalify Node Data

I imagine we could create a new "Actions" column and a button that says "Suggest Issue" in that column of each node list. Example:

Here's an example of an issue I created from a single node in Equalify: https://github.com/WordPress/wporg-mu-plugins/issues/622

Here is the conversation I had to create that issue: https://chatgpt.com/share/174d5f0b-0feb-46da-a850-9dc5cb7eb97b

Here is the prompt behind the ChatGPT GPT I created:

The bot analyzes a provided URL, violation message, and code snippet to resolve accessibility issues by considering the entire HTML page. Output text that can be posted to a GitHub issue with the following sections: Description, Current Code, Proposed Fix, Updated Code,  Steps to Reproduce, Acceptance Criteria, How critical is this fix?, Affected Pages. Also, suggest a title for the Issue that starts with "Equalify Reports" and add a section "Reviewed by" with the body content "This ticket was automatically generated by Equalify and reviewed by the human, [your-name]."

Issue from a Single Equalify Message with Multiple Nodes

I imagine we could create a button on the top of a Message detail page that generates issue text. Here is a screenshot example:

Here's an example of an issue I created from a single node in Equalify: https://github.com/WordPress/wporg-mu-plugins/issues/622

Here is the conversation I had to create that issue: https://chatgpt.com/share/405e54a9-a06d-4c2d-86a3-cf4344bbcb69

Here is the prompt behind the ChatGPT GPT I created:

You are a bot that outputs a GitHub ticket to resolve issues related to a web accessibility violation message the user prompts you with. The user will attach a CSV to their message with rows of nodes. Each row contains nodes' HTML, related message, and URLs that triggered the violation. 

Output text that can be posted to a GitHub issue with the following sections: 
- Description: Brief description of the issue.
- Current Code: A link to the CSV that is uploaded
- Example Fix: Offer an example of fixing one node.
- Steps to Reproduce: Include visiting the URL and testing using a browser's web inspector and the Lighthouse tool
- Acceptance Criteria
- How critical is this fix?: Include how this violation harms the user experience and the number of nodes fixing this issue would fix, which is the number of rows in the spreadsheet. 

Also, suggest a title for the Issue that starts with "Equalify Reports" and add a section "Reviewed by" with the body content "This ticket was automatically generated by Equalify and reviewed by the human, [your-name]."

Bounty Details

• Anyone interested in tackling this issue should submit details on how they would technically achieve these goals, in addition to a budget.
• Submissions should have clear deliverables.
• 50% will be paid upfront and 50% on completion.
• We'll discuss the budget and approve/deny this as a team during one of our Monday contributor meetings.
• The project can have phased-out components.

[bbertucc]

@heythisischris expressed early interest in this bounty. Pinging him here. We definitely have to factor in our money in the bank and the fact that this is a speculative feature (a feature no one has directly said they'll pay for) when deciding on the bounty.

[heythisischris]

I'm definitely interested in tackling this one. Here's my proposed solution:

Overview

We'll leverage GPT-4o (possibly mini) to create GitHub tickets from individual Equalify issues. This will be exposed both on the frontend and via a developer-facing API endpoint. I'll start with the prompt Blake provided and refine as needed.

The resulting link will be a pre-populated GitHub link with a draft of the given issue (you can click to test it out!):

https://github.com/equalifyeverything/equalify/issues/new?title=test&assignee=&body=This%20is%20a%20new%20issue&labels[]=accessibility

We could even allow developers to link their GitHub account so we officially publish GitHub Issues on behalf of developers.

I'd like to take this a step further and incorporate a new "Copilot" tab which allows the user to chat with a specialized Equalify Copilot chat tool which can help developers debug their accessibility fixes, look for insights/trends in their data, set alerts for certain accessibility fixes, etc.

I'll create two new tables to store responses from both of these endpoints, issues and conversations.

I might create a new column inside of users to store the GitHub token called github_token.

I'll also apply for $25,000 of Azure credit via the Microsoft for Startups program which will effectively give us $25,000 of OpenAI credit using their Azure OpenAI service (1 year expiry).

Steps

• [ ] Create POST /help/create-ticket endpoint

Request body:

{
    "codeSnippet": "<textarea name=\"input_4\" id=\"input_7_4\" class=\"textarea large\" aria-describedby=\"gfield_description_7_4\" aria-required=\"true\" aria-invalid=\"false\" rows=\"10\" cols=\"50\"></textarea>",
    "url": "https://equalify.app/",
    "repository": "https://github.com/EqualifyEverything/equalify",
    "author": "heythisischris",
    "labels": ["accessibility"],
    "template": "## Overview\nThis is the overview\n\n## Tasks\nThese are the tasks required to fix the issue\n\n##Timeline\nThis issue will be fixed in 1 week."
}

Request response:

{
    "url": "https://github.com/equalifyeverything/equalify/issues/new?title=test&assignee=&body=This%20is%20a%20new%20issue&labels[]=accessibility"
}

Responses will be stored inside of issues table.

• [ ] Create POST /help/copilot endpoint

Request body:

[
    { "user": "What is the most common accessibility issue identified?" }
]

Request response:

[
    { "user": "What is the most common accessibility issue identified?" },
    { "system": "The most common issue I found was \"Element's background color could not be determined because it's partially obscured by another element\"" }
]

Responses will be stored inside of conversations table.

Budget

The requested bounty is $2,500 for roughly 40 hours of development spread across 2 weeks.

This comes out to an effective rate of $62.50/hour.

Timeline

I intend to have this completed and ready for by August 5th, 2024.

[bbertucc]

Thanks @heythisischris! We'll probably discuss this on our July 29 contributor call. I want to make sure we focus on getting Version 1 up before we start adding features.

[kevinandrews1]

@heythisischris I read this on my phone, which is probably why the code looks gnarly listening to it with voiceover. Lol. Where does accessibility fall into this? I would love to discuss with you before too long.

[bbertucc]

@heythisischris what is the date of delivery for this? I'll create a milestone and add reminders for myself to check in on it. We can organize a mini release around this feature.

[BaronWolfenstein]

I actually have an NVIDIA developer account, so let me talk with Kaju and see if we're interested in putting a bid in on this

[heythisischris]

@heythisischris what is the date of delivery for this? I'll create a milestone and add reminders for myself to check in on it. We can organize a mini release around this feature.

@bbertucc Normally I would say delivery date is pushed back a week, but I think I can stretch and get this done by Friday, August 9th, 2024 (if not sooner). The goal would be to create a simple and pragmatic solution using conventional LLM services and a basic web UI to accompany it. And @kevinandrews1, we could even pave some space in building an accessible AI chatbot interface.

But I am curious about @BaronWolfenstein's potential proposal- I'm assuming it would involve training/using a custom model.

[BaronWolfenstein]

I'm gonna go to Scale tomorrow and work on putting a proposal up. I'm happy to talk with you more about it @heythisischris, I did send Blake some details on what constitutes the NVIDIA program.

[bbertucc]

@heythisischris that's an amazingly ambitious goal. Love it. I also want this to a feature we announce on it's own. So could we roll it out next week instead?

This week we're already announcing the launch of the app. Next week, we can announce the LLM. Say, next Wednesday at 11:11 CST?

I'll formally bless this feature and push the cash deposit as soon as these are done:

• 387

• 383

• 375

• 348

...which is basically to say #335 is done.

Very curious to hear from @BaronWolfenstein on his proposal tool. There's always room to expand on LLM features. @BaronWolfenstein please share any documents here. I'm a man of Open Source and quickly forget anything DMed to me.

[bbertucc]

@heythisischris I went ahead and assigned this to you, adding a milestone for next week delivery.

[bbertucc]

@BaronWolfenstein if you don't mind, add your proposal to a new issue here: #391

[bbertucc]

This is approved for delivery september 2.