Open bbertucc opened 4 days ago
@bbertucc This one is tricky... deals with how we're processing scans in general. We'll have to run through the lifecycle of a scan, test, and see what's going on. My hunch is 6 hours.
@heythisischris would it help if we approve an hour or two for investigation to get at a better understanding of what is going on? I imagine we'll need to run the URL over 2-3 different days and track where the issue is starting before you come up with a fix.
If that is the case, I would be curious to know what you're looking at over the amount of time you need to determine where the issue is.
@heythisischris said that 2 hours is reasonable on our call to get a sense of the problem. He'll then post a summary of the problem and additional notes on how to fix with a budget for that. Approved.
Overview
This page wasn't updated to the best of Joel's knowledge. Why is there a rollercoaster? New issues shouldn't have been added or fixed after the fact. What went wrong where? And how can we fix it?
Here is the URL: https://registrar.duke.edu
Here is a screenshot:
Bountied
Since this is a bountied issue, Assignees should post an estimate that is then approved as per this note in the handbook: https://github.com/EqualifyEverything/handbook?tab=readme-ov-file#how-are-bounties-budgeted