Closed naroner closed 1 month ago
There are similar complaints … this may be a duplicate of one of them.
Excess categories not shown, in v 3.1.10.
Set of labels matching bugs in progress. Excess categories complete. Steps 1.26, 2.17 and 11.9 are all being addressed.
Users will recheck with 3.1.13
@ericthomasswenson This is still an issue in 3.1.19:
15:24:27.7941 Destination Specific GHGTTS Request to Engine #2 (1)
15:24:27.7981 18EA01F9 [3] FF FA 00 (TX)
15:24:27.8721 1CFAFF01 [16] FA 00 00 00 00 F9 00 00 00 00 F8 00 00 00 00 00
Green House Gas Stored 100 Hour Active Technology Tracking from Engine #2 (1):
Active Technology: Mfg Defined Active Technology 1 (250), Time = 0.000 s, Vehicle Distance = 0.000 km
Active Technology: Mfg Defined Active Technology 2 (249), Time = 0.000 s, Vehicle Distance = 0.000 km
Active Technology: Mfg Defined Active Technology 3 (248), Time = 0.000 s, Vehicle Distance = 0.000 km
15:24:27.8751 GHG Active Technology Arrays from Engine #2 (1)
|-------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------|
| | Active | Active | Stored | Stored | | |
| Index | 100 Hour | 100 Hour | 100 Hour | 100 Hour | Lifetime | Lifetime |
| Description | Time, m | Dist, km | Time, m | Dist, km | Time, m | Dist, km |
|-------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------|
| SAE/ISO Reserved | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 69,625,446 | 0 |
| Waste Heat Recovery | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0 | 0 |
| Mfg Defined Active Technology 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
| Mfg Defined Active Technology 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A |
| Mfg Defined Active Technology 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|-------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------|
FAIL: 6.11.13.12.e - Number of active labels received differs from the number of lifetime labels
FAIL: 6.11.13.12.e - Number of stored labels received differs from the number of lifetime labels
FAIL: 6.11.13.12.f - Active labels received is not a subset of lifetime labels
FAIL: 6.11.13.12.f - Stored labels received is not a subset of lifetime labels
@ericthomasswenson The above makes more sense to be under #1233
Using data from this bug report I created a unit test and found the bug. I assume the correct output should be:
10:15:30.0000 GHG Active Technology Arrays from Engine #1 (0)
|-------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------|
| | Active | Active | Stored | Stored | | |
| Index | 100 Hour | 100 Hour | 100 Hour | 100 Hour | Lifetime | Lifetime |
| Description | Time, m | Dist, km | Time, m | Dist, km | Time, m | Dist, km |
|-------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------|
| Mfg Defined Active Technology 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Mfg Defined Active Technology 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mfg Defined Active Technology 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|-------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------|
The bug was a continuation of the "interpreting the lifetime packet as a 100 hour packet" bug that was discovered a while back.
Tool issues a failure for the labels for active/stored not being a subset of lifetime. This doesn't align with ARB's requirements. I suggest that it is changed to check if stored/lifetime are a subset of active.