Closed EastEriq closed 1 year ago
The same problem, trivially, is seen using AI.createMask
instead of assigning explicitly a matrix.
Getting there? Without creating the mask:
>> AI(2).WCS.CRPIX
ans =
909.84 905.03
Creating a mask:
>> AI(2).WCS.CRPIX
ans =
909.84 -1132
so what was the problem?
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 5:33 PM EastEriq @.***> wrote:
Closed #224 https://github.com/EranOfek/AstroPack/issues/224 as completed.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/EranOfek/AstroPack/issues/224#event-10201943533, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJUQ4JCQMVVLTNDIFS4L4DXXNLD5ANCNFSM6AAAAAA4AJMUIQ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; }
Il 27/08/23 19:00, EranOfek ha scritto:
so what was the problem?
that I lost nearly 4 hours to track your bug. See the commit
referred to.
Message
ID: ***@***.***>
[
{ @.": "http://schema.org", @.": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { @.": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/EranOfek/AstroPack/issues/224#issuecomment-1694702393", "url": "https://github.com/EranOfek/AstroPack/issues/224#issuecomment-1694702393", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { @.": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]
Continuing from the "not your fault" in #182. My test case:
Leaving the third line commented, the sexagesimal FK5 coordinates of the lower left corner of the second subimage are [147.45,69.18] (correct and contiguous to the upper corner of subimage 1).
Uncommenting the third line, they become [147.59, 68.61].
Wrong WCS coordinates lead to subsequent astrometry failures, as complained in #176.