Closed EastEriq closed 9 months ago
I get FWHM
AI.PSFData.fwhm
of 1.9 pixels which is consistent with the expectation and this specific image.
wait - you are the one who said that it looks bad
AT first glace it looks too narrow, but it is actually ok.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:36 PM EastEriq @.***> wrote:
wait - you are the one who said that it looks bad
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/EranOfek/AstroPack/issues/266#issuecomment-1843011739, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABJUQ4L75OKUURHVQVZMSK3YIB7GLAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6N4DO66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNBTGAYTCNZTHE . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>
(Eran asked for the ticket) Images are on euler. Level 1 image is![image](https://github.com/EranOfek/AstroPack/assets/16066531/917c7ae5-26fc-4420-8b29-5af674675099)
/raid/enrico/PTF/2ndTake/images/level1/proc/2016/03/27/f12/c2/p5/v2/PTF_201603271521_i_p_scie_t033859_u027339000_f12_p100037_c02.fits
The script used is/raid/enrico/PTF/2ndTake/matlab/astrometryProgramFlow.m
This is the resultingAI(2).PSFData.surface
and eran says that it looks bad.