Closed alxiong closed 5 months ago
@chancharles92 I think the reason why we were starting from g^0
is due to the default behavior of Radix2EvaluationDomain::new()
when iterating over its elements, starts with pow=0
I now become a bit hesitant to change, because shifting the entire evaluation domain, means overriding the iterator. (EvaluationDomain
doesn't work like a vector where you would just rotate left, but as an iterator, so we would have to change this in our forked of arkwork)
I mean it's doable, but add more complexity.
maybe we should simply argue that, this slight deviation from the original paper is fine. (secure and minimal inconsistency), wdyt?
I would vote that we keep our current form, and a mark by the side noting the difference from the original paper.
Agree, let's keep it and maybe add a comment in the API.
let's keep it and maybe add a comment in the API.
I wouldn't worry too much about this. it's not that informative. closing this issue now.
As pointed out by CommonPrefix team:
the current multiplicative subgroup start from
g^0
instead of\omega= g^1
as described by the original paper. While this choice shouldn't affect security, it's still nicer to be more faithful to the paper.