search

Esqarrouth / EZSwiftExtensions

:smirk: How Swift standard types and classes were supposed to work.
MIT License
3k stars 381 forks source link

Cocoapods Update #481

Closed Esqarrouth closed 6 years ago

Esqarrouth commented 6 years ago

I tried to do this and got this error. My development tools might not be up to date. 

 -> EZSwiftExtensions (1.12)
    - ERROR | xcodebuild: Returned an unsuccessful exit code. You can use `--verbose` for more information.
    - ERROR | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/EZSwiftFunctions.swift:81:9: error: unexpected platform condition (expected 'os', 'arch', or 'swift')
    - ERROR | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/EZSwiftFunctions.swift:90:9: error: unexpected platform condition (expected 'os', 'arch', or 'swift')
    - ERROR | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/ArrayExtensions.swift:117:16: error: value of type 'EnumeratedSequence<[Element]>' has no member 'compactMap'
    - WARN  | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/DictionaryExtensions.swift:31:33: warning: redundant conformance constraint 'K': 'Equatable'
    - NOTE  | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/DictionaryExtensions.swift:31:74: note: conformance constraint 'K': 'Equatable' inferred from type here
    - WARN  | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/DictionaryExtensions.swift:180:19: warning: redundant conformance constraint 'K': 'Hashable'
    - NOTE  | xcodebuild:  /Users/gok2/Downloads/EZSwiftExtensions-master/Sources/DictionaryExtensions.swift:180:40: note: conformance constraint 'K': 'Hashable' inferred from type here

Check this out to how to do it: https://github.com/thellimist/EZPods Pods Update CheckList

isimple4 commented 6 years ago

@goktugyil It looks like your Xcode and Swift version are a bit out of date, since these changes like compactMap were introduced since Xcode 9.3. You can also take a look at my commit in #477 .

Maybe try updating Xcode and see if it works.

isimple4 commented 6 years ago

Current codes are built based on Xcode 9.3 and Swift 4.1, maybe we should revert some changes and provide a version for Swift 4.0.

Speaking of version, 1.12 is kind of confusing, is it possible that we can use semantic versioning like 2.0.x for Swift 4.0, 2.1.x for Swift 4.1, 3.0.x for Swift 5.0 for better understanding?

Esqarrouth commented 6 years ago

@Khalian

Khalian commented 6 years ago

Taking a look.

Khalian commented 6 years ago

@isimple4 I guess I could make it 2.0, but we did not do it for the swift 2 -> 3 migration. Anyone else feels 2 is a good idea can comment on it.

Khalian commented 6 years ago

https://github.com/goktugyil/EZSwiftExtensions/pull/483

Khalian commented 6 years ago

I released the version as 2.0 on @isimple4 recommendation. https://github.com/goktugyil/EZSwiftExtensions/pull/487 there is a retroactive pull request for it. Once thats done, i will close this request.