Date formatter performance

[rahimkhalid]

Checklist

• [ ] New Extension
• [ ] New Test
• [ ] Changed more than one extension, but all changes are related
• [x] Trivial change (doesn't require changelog)

[EZSwiftExtensionsBot]

	3 Messages
:book:	Executed 205 tests, with 0 failures (0 unexpected) in 5.091 (5.319) seconds
:book:	Executed 190 tests, with 0 failures (0 unexpected) in 4.290 (4.469) seconds
:book:	Executed 127 tests, with 0 failures (0 unexpected) in 3.814 (3.883) seconds

Generated by :no_entry_sign: Danger

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #493 into master will increase coverage by 0.76%. The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #493      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    43.6%   44.37%   +0.76%     
==========================================
  Files          52       53       +1     
  Lines        2314     2346      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits         1009     1041      +32     
  Misses       1305     1305

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Sources/SynchronizedDictionary.swift	100% <100%> (ø)
Sources/DateExtensions.swift	97.14% <100%> (+0.36%)	:arrow_up:

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 8e9e81e...f1be0e5. Read the comment docs.

[rahimkhalid]

@Khalian @goktugyil can you kindly add reviewers for this PR.

[rahimkhalid]

@Khalian I think this pull request is now ready to be merged.