codecov[bot]
commented
11 months ago Codecov Report
All modified lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
33aba89) 100.00% compared to head (1b2490e) 100.00%. Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1132 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 177 177 Lines 3245 3245 Branches 550 550 ========================================= Hits 3245 3245 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Esri/arcgis-rest-js/pull/1132?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Esri) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...s-rest-portal/src/groups/update-user-membership.ts](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Esri/arcgis-rest-js/pull/1132?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Esri#diff-cGFja2FnZXMvYXJjZ2lzLXJlc3QtcG9ydGFsL3NyYy9ncm91cHMvdXBkYXRlLXVzZXItbWVtYmVyc2hpcC50cw==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This pull request addresses issue #1124. The documentation for the
updateUserMembershipsfunction was incorrect, suggesting the use ofadminsas a parameter, while the correct parameters areusersandnewMemberType.The comments in the code have been updated to reflect the correct usage of the function. This should ensure that the automatically generated documentation is now correct.