Closed nwhittaker closed 6 months ago
Adding design folks to this issue to determine next steps and evaluation across the components in alignment with textarea.
@geospatialem Next steps are to remove the double opacity, matching the above expected behavior. If there are no other questions, we should be able to mark this ready for dev
.
@geospatialem Next steps are to remove the double opacity, matching the above expected behavior. If there are no other questions, we should be able to mark this
ready for dev
.
@ashetland Awesome, think we'd just need a Figma url, or screenshot of the expected outcome then this is ready for dev
🚀 .
cc @geospatialem, @brittneytewks
Installed and assigned for verification.
🍬 Verified on 2.9.0-next.18
Check existing issues
Actual Behavior
The disabled state for a
text-area
element is very low contrast and inconsistent with the disabled state of the other input components.Expected Behavior
I was expecting the colors used in the text-area's disabled state to match the colors used in the inputs' disabled state.
Reproduction Sample
https://codepen.io/nwhittaker-esri/pen/ZEwwwMy
Reproduction Steps
Visit the repro. and visually compare the disabled components.
Reproduction Version
2.0.0
Relevant Info
Inspecting the
calcite-text-area
component, it looks like a0.5
opacity is getting doubly applied. Once to the:host
and once to the:host textarea
element.Regression?
No response
Priority impact
p3 - want for upcoming milestone
Impact
No response
Calcite package
Esri team
ArcGIS Field Apps