Open geospatialem opened 2 months ago
The efforts of #3455 seem to resolve the behavior from above. Will confirm if the behavior is mitigated once the efforts of #3455 are merged - targeted for May 2024.
@geospatialem, I'm seeing the same bug with two non-range pickers as well. I have a repro in case you want to roll that into the testing for this one, or I can create a separate issue.
@geospatialem, I'm seeing the same bug with two non-range pickers as well. I have a repro in case you want to roll that into the testing for this one, or I can create a separate issue.
@nwhittaker Good catch - updated the context of the issue above to include range
and non-range and added your Codepen sample to the above for context and verification.
Check existing issues
Actual Behavior
When multiple
input-date-pickers
with, or withoutrange
are active in an app, the component's can observe a buggy behavior when interacting with thedate-picker
.For instance, with![picker-issue](https://github.com/Esri/calcite-design-system/assets/5023024/04c046a4-a4c8-4b3b-a200-a7341ec20dc4)
range
active:Expected Behavior
Multiple
input-date-pickers
can be present in an app with no buggy behavior.Reproduction Sample
Reproduction Steps
First sample:
input-date-picker
input-date-picker
input-date-picker
input-date-picker
and attempting to open the firstinput-date-picker
Second sample:
input-date-picker
input-date-0picker
Reproduction Version
2.7.1
Relevant Info
Regression?
No response
Priority impact
p4 - not time sensitive
Impact
No response
Calcite package
Esri team
Calcite (dev)