Open chris-fox opened 7 years ago
It looks like the staging database is hard coding the text field it creates to a length of 255 even if the source and target support larger than that. So it fails when it attempts to append data into the staging feature class.
should we just move it to 2000?
Why not just use the value of the target to truly reflect the output?
or that :)
I vote for 2^31-1.
2^31-1
http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/administer-file-gdbs/file-geodatabase-size-and-name-limits.htm
It looks like the staging database is hard coding the text field it creates to a length of 255 even if the source and target support larger than that. So it fails when it attempts to append data into the staging feature class.