search

Esri / joint-military-symbology-xml

Joint Military Symbology Markup Language is a data encapsulation of MIL-STD-2525D and APP-6(D).
Apache License 2.0
139 stars 58 forks source link

Graphic Examples from the standard do not have codes or SVGs #340

Open joebayles opened 6 years ago

joebayles commented 6 years ago

There are several graphics in the beginning of the standard that do not make it into the codes, to include:

See below for examples

Suggest we discuss how to support this.

image image image

mepler commented 6 years ago

These are amplifiers which are not transmitted via SIDC.

joebayles commented 6 years ago

Agreed, but regardless, they should be supported.

joebayles commented 6 years ago

@twornicki has a path forward, will share.

joebayles commented 5 years ago

@twornicki @ottenw @wmcgrane

While engagement is not currently transmitted in the SIDC, the standard spends four pages explaining what this should look like. What messages would transmit the following codes? This is imperative for implementers to fully support MIL-STD-2525 and/or APP-6.

Engagement amplifier bar structure: A:BBB-CC Part 1 - A - Engagement Location Part 2 - BBB - Engagement State Part 3 - CC - Weapon Deployment

Code Location
Local
R Remote
B Mixture
Code State
ASN Assign/Cover
ENG Engage
MIF Missile in Flight
CF Cease Fire
CE Cease Engage
HF Hold Fire
TE Terminate Engagement
BE Break Engagement
MBE Management by Exception
M<T MBE Less than Threshold
MLT Multiple Engagements
MIF Mixture
Code Weapon
M Missile
BM Ballistic Missile
CM Cruise Missile
GN Gun
T Torpedo
A Attack Aircraft
C Combat Air Patrol
D Defensive Counter-Air
UW Undersea Warfare
MW Mine Warfare
SW Surface Warfare
EA Electronic Attack
ED Electronic Defense
UV Unmanned Vehicle
CW Close-in Weapon System
L3 LAMPS
VA Vertical Launch ASROC
## Number of Engagements (02+)

FYI @jeconley

ottenw commented 5 years ago

@joebayles @Twornicki @wmcgrane This category of amplifiers was brought in either by Navy or Air Force, so I'll guess the message standard would be MIL-STD-6016 Link 16

Twornicki commented 5 years ago

This was brought in by a USN MIL07-64 change proposal. How the information is transferred is unknown by me.

ottenw commented 5 years ago

That makes sense, it's a Dr. Jake submitted change proposal from back when he was contracted to support Missile Defense Agency (MDA).