search

Esri / joint-military-symbology-xml

Joint Military Symbology Markup Language is a data encapsulation of MIL-STD-2525D and APP-6(D).
Apache License 2.0
143 stars 56 forks source link

Cross-Country Mobility Symbology #342

Open joebayles opened 7 years ago

joebayles commented 7 years ago

In Chapter II of JP 2-01.3, Joint Intelligence Preparation of the Operational Environment (and several other publications), there are references to products of the IPB process, including cross-country mobility, mobility corridors, and others. These should be standardized and incorporated into MIL-STD-2525 (and APP-6).

Cross-country mobility:

Used to represent the trafficability of the terrain, usually:

Trafficable Somewhat Trafficable Untrafficable
Unrestricted Restricted Severely Restricted
Go Slow-Go No-Go
Green Amber Red
Clear Diagonal Lines Cross-Hatched Diagonal Lines

Mobility Corridors:

Used to represent canalization of the terrain, usually with either brackets or a line, denoted by echelon size.

image JP 2-01.3

image Hand-sketched cross-country mobility and mobility corridors

FYI:

@mepler @ottenw @llsjr2

ottenw commented 7 years ago

IMHO, mobility corridors is a possibility. I'll have to disagree with CCM and MCOO. When created, both products include a legend. Based upon a number of factors, the visual representation of speed/mobility prediction categories is different - there isn't a one size fits all. I'd be more than happy to discuss this during a sidebar (with a whiteboard?) at the next SSMC which I believe is October in Leavenworth.

wmcgrane commented 7 years ago

Cross-Country Mobility Symbology is now on the agenda......

Bill McGrane Chair, SSMC DISA BDE4 Standards Management Branch Comm: 301-225-7383 DSN: 312-375-7383

-----Original Message----- From: Bill Otten [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 2:05 PM To: Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Cross-Country Mobility Symbology (#342)

All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.

IMHO, mobility corridors is a possibility. I'll have to disagree with CCM and MCOO. When created, both products include a legend. Based upon a number of factors, the visual representation of speed/mobility prediction categories is different - there isn't a one size fits all. I'd be more than happy to discuss this during a sidebar (with a whiteboard?) at the next SSMC which I believe is October in Leavenworth.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < Caution-https://github.com/Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml/issues/342#issuecomment-324416148 > , or mute the thread < Caution-https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI5Tbf7WGXR_b1aGM2a652rrMabRDUukks5sbGnogaJpZM4O29N_ > . <Caution-https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AI5TbcS4RUb09js2D7x1_U-LOOf2BXNNks5sbGnogaJpZM4O29N_.gif>

joebayles commented 5 years ago

@mgoble - thoughts? Would you like a MIL-STD-2525 or ADP 1-02-approved way of demonstrating CCM?

@ottenw - agreed on mobility corridors.

mgoble commented 5 years ago

I believe a MIL-STD-2525 or ADP 1-02-approved way of demonstrating CCM would be a good idea. I understand we can not always symbolize MCOOs or CCMs to a standard. However it would definitely help to have a standard in MIL-STD-2525 or ADP 1-02 to use as underlying support or foundation.