ottenw
commented
5 years ago Concur with existence of this problem; will add to draw rules scrub / update I'm working on.
Open joebayles opened 5 years ago
ottenw
commented
5 years ago Concur with existence of this problem; will add to draw rules scrub / update I'm working on.
ottenw
commented
5 years ago 3 of 5 are drawn right to left, 2 of 5 are drawn left to right. My CP will change the 2 left to right so all 5 are drawn right to left.
ottenw
commented
5 years ago Now that I am actively working on the change proposal to fix this issue, my initial thoughts on how to fix it may not be the best solution. All of the five obstacle lines listed in this issue share the identical draw rule Line1 in MIL-STD-2525D(1). In looking at these lines in the standard, I'm thinking they should have a draw rule and templates that have as much in common with wire and fence obstacles as possible. I'll have a working draft change proposal this week for the gentlemen listed in this issue.
wmcgrane
commented
5 years ago Mr. Otten: Is this issue OBE via the SP you submitted recently on draw rule changes, or is this a separate issue?
Bill
Bill McGrane Chair, SSMC (Mil-Std-2525 Joint Military Symbology) DISA BDE4 Standards Management Branch Comm: 301-225-7383 DSN: 312-375-7383
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Otten notifications@github.com Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 2:05 PM To: Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Mcgrane, William M (Bill) CIV DISA BD (US) william.m.mcgrane.civ@mail.mil; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Draw Rules for Antitank Ditch and Wall (#518)
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Now that I am actively working on the change proposal to fix this issue, my initial thoughts on how to fix it may not be the best solution. All of the five obstacle lines listed in this issue share the identical draw rule Line1 in MIL-STD-2525D(1). In looking at these lines in the standard, I'm thinking they should have a draw rule and templates that have as much in common with wire and fence obstacles as possible. I'll have a working draft change proposal this week for the gentlemen listed in this issue.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < Caution-https://github.com/Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml/issues/518#issuecomment-488361618 > , or mute the thread < Caution-https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHFG3OHEWPQ5VSIPRSHFX3PTHLTZANCNFSM4FS7SHUQ > . <Caution-https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ACHFG3MAG7BEHO5L6UP22HDPTHLTZA5CNFSM4FS7SHU2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODUN45EQ.gif>
wmcgrane
commented
5 years ago CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Good Morning Bill (McG),
Happy Monday! I will have a new SP for this. It has expanded a bit in scope as I am looking at all lines within control measure symbology that include a "line decoration" and/or words to the effect of a reference to the decoration and "face towards the enemy" or "towards the obstacle". It'd on close to the top of my SCP drafting list so I would imaging I will be sending the draft to Carlos sometime this week.
Have a great day!
V/R,
Bill Otten
Senior Systems Engineer PM Mission Command, TMD SETA contractor support CACI, INC. – FEDERAL
PM Mission Command Field Office 4722 Rideout Road, room C22B413 Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 35805 Office: 256-842-1948 Mobile: 443-243-9777 william.r.otten.ctr@mail.mil Please consider the environment before printing this email
-----Original Message----- From: Mcgrane, William M (Bill) CIV DISA BD (US) Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 5:52 AM To: Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml reply@reply.github.com; Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Mention mention@noreply.github.com; Otten, William R CTR USARMY PEO C3T (USA) william.r.otten.ctr@mail.mil; Epler, Michael S [US] (MS) (Contr) Michael.Epler@ngc.com Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Draw Rules for Antitank Ditch and Wall (#518)
Mr. Otten: Is this issue OBE via the SP you submitted recently on draw rule changes, or is this a separate issue?
Bill
Bill McGrane Chair, SSMC (Mil-Std-2525 Joint Military Symbology) DISA BDE4 Standards Management Branch Comm: 301-225-7383 DSN: 312-375-7383
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Otten notifications@github.com Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 2:05 PM To: Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Mcgrane, William M (Bill) CIV DISA BD (US) william.m.mcgrane.civ@mail.mil; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Draw Rules for Antitank Ditch and Wall (#518)
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Now that I am actively working on the change proposal to fix this issue, my initial thoughts on how to fix it may not be the best solution. All of the five obstacle lines listed in this issue share the identical draw rule Line1 in MIL-STD-2525D(1). In looking at these lines in the standard, I'm thinking they should have a draw rule and templates that have as much in common with wire and fence obstacles as possible. I'll have a working draft change proposal this week for the gentlemen listed in this issue.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < Caution-https://github.com/Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml/issues/518#issuecomment-488361618 > , or mute the thread < Caution-https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHFG3OHEWPQ5VSIPRSHFX3PTHLTZANCNFSM4FS7SHUQ > . <Caution-https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ACHFG3MAG7BEHO5L6UP22HDPTHLTZA5CNFSM4FS7SHU2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODUN45EQ.gif>
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
wmcgrane
commented
5 years ago Okay, great. Looking forward to seeing that SCP.
Bill
Bill McGrane Chair, SSMC (Mil-Std-2525 Joint Military Symbology) DISA BDE4 Standards Management Branch Comm: 301-225-7383 DSN: 312-375-7383
-----Original Message----- From: Otten, William R CTR USARMY PEO C3T (USA) william.r.otten.ctr@mail.mil Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:17 AM To: Mcgrane, William M (Bill) CIV DISA BD (US) william.m.mcgrane.civ@mail.mil; Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml reply@reply.github.com; Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Mention mention@noreply.github.com; Epler, Michael S [US] (MS) (Contr) Michael.Epler@ngc.com Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Draw Rules for Antitank Ditch and Wall (#518) (UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Good Morning Bill (McG),
Happy Monday! I will have a new SP for this. It has expanded a bit in scope as I am looking at all lines within control measure symbology that include a "line decoration" and/or words to the effect of a reference to the decoration and "face towards the enemy" or "towards the obstacle". It'd on close to the top of my SCP drafting list so I would imaging I will be sending the draft to Carlos sometime this week.
Have a great day!
V/R,
Bill Otten
Senior Systems Engineer PM Mission Command, TMD SETA contractor support CACI, INC. – FEDERAL
PM Mission Command Field Office 4722 Rideout Road, room C22B413 Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 35805 Office: 256-842-1948 Mobile: 443-243-9777 william.r.otten.ctr@mail.mil Please consider the environment before printing this email
-----Original Message----- From: Mcgrane, William M (Bill) CIV DISA BD (US) Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 5:52 AM To: Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml reply@reply.github.com; Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Mention mention@noreply.github.com; Otten, William R CTR USARMY PEO C3T (USA) william.r.otten.ctr@mail.mil; Epler, Michael S [US] (MS) (Contr) Michael.Epler@ngc.com Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Draw Rules for Antitank Ditch and Wall (#518)
Mr. Otten: Is this issue OBE via the SP you submitted recently on draw rule changes, or is this a separate issue?
Bill
Bill McGrane Chair, SSMC (Mil-Std-2525 Joint Military Symbology) DISA BDE4 Standards Management Branch Comm: 301-225-7383 DSN: 312-375-7383
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Otten notifications@github.com Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 2:05 PM To: Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml joint-military-symbology-xml@noreply.github.com Cc: Mcgrane, William M (Bill) CIV DISA BD (US) william.m.mcgrane.civ@mail.mil; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml] Draw Rules for Antitank Ditch and Wall (#518)
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Now that I am actively working on the change proposal to fix this issue, my initial thoughts on how to fix it may not be the best solution. All of the five obstacle lines listed in this issue share the identical draw rule Line1 in MIL-STD-2525D(1). In looking at these lines in the standard, I'm thinking they should have a draw rule and templates that have as much in common with wire and fence obstacles as possible. I'll have a working draft change proposal this week for the gentlemen listed in this issue.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < Caution-https://github.com/Esri/joint-military-symbology-xml/issues/518#issuecomment-488361618 > , or mute the thread < Caution-https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHFG3OHEWPQ5VSIPRSHFX3PTHLTZANCNFSM4FS7SHUQ > . <Caution-https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ACHFG3MAG7BEHO5L6UP22HDPTHLTZA5CNFSM4FS7SHU2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODUN45EQ.gif>
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
From https://github.com/Esri/military-symbology/issues/273
The point ordering for these two items is reversed, in both 2525C and 2525D.
Looking at the point order, some draw left to right, and others draw right to left, if the teeth are to be oriented the same way.
This issue also affects Obstacle Line (25290100), which is Right to Left.
FYI @ottenw, @wmcgrane, @mepler, @twornicki