(DOC) Differences between Tool Name in Pro Doc Tables vs GP Tool Names in Toolbox

[csmoore]

There are some small difference in the names between the doc (military_tools_for_arcgis_in_arcgis_pro.pdf) - Tool | Description tables and the actual GP Tool names in Pro (Military Tools for ArcGIS 1.0):

Section - An overview of the Visibility toolset

• Add LLOS (doc) vs. Add Linear Line Of Sight Fields (GP Tool Name has extra space also) <--- This is the only significant issue
• Add RLOS Observer Fields (doc) vs. Add Radial Line of Sight Observer Fields (GP Tool Name)

Section - An overview of the Distance and Direction toolset:

• Range Rings (from Interval) (doc) vs. Range Rings From Interval (GP Tool Name)
• Range Rings from Minimum Maximum vs. Range Rings From Minimum And Maximum
• Range Rings from Minimum Maximum Table vs. Range Rings From Minimum And Maximum Table

All Tools:

• Very Minor - inconsistent case of "to" "of" "To" "Of" in both GP Tools and Doc

[mfunk]

These are almost all doc bugs that need to be fixed in the PDF.

[dfoll]

Just picked this issue up. Spoke with Ash, currently the capitalization rule for gp tools is all caps ex. Tool Name: TableToPoint Tool Label: Table To Point

[dfoll]

• [x] tool names are consistent between the doc and actual .pyt

  Tool names capitalized properly

• [x] change name of GRG toolset to "Gridded Reference Graphic"
• [x] Table to Polygon should be renamed to "Table To Polygon"
• [x] Create GRG from Area should be "Create GRG From Area"
• [x] Create GRG from Point should be "Create GRG From Point"
• [x] Create Reference System GRG from Area should be "Create Reference System GRG From Area"

  293

[mfunk]

All tool names are all caps. Even “From”, “To”, “And”, etc. That has always been the convention from GP.

[dfoll]

this work is done, waiting on a review

[ACueva]

Verified in CMS and PYT toolbox itself.