Closed Dbarnes1 closed 6 years ago
Why not just give the user full control on how they want to set up their own symbology similar to what we have done with the settings page on the GRG widget
@adgiles you're right, we should do that (updated title). I still think we should improve on the default symbology settings though.
I think that this should include adding a spill icon.
Basically I see 4 layers that need to be symbolized once the inputs are run and the graphic is created: -spill point icon -initial isolation zone (small circle) -protective action zone (the fan) -bounding box
I've documented for these settings in the configure topic and settings topic, moving to in progress
@adgiles is there any way we can get the point icon to persist once the ERG graphic is created?
The black polygon layer for spill point is very hard to see in the resulting feature service
@adgiles @joebayles Did we make the spill location a polygon instead of a point feature because in the future we would like to support area spills?
No, I just couldn't mix points and polygons in the same layer, I can make it bigger if you want
I have increased the buffer size from 2.5m to 10m to make the spill location bigger. We can possibly go a little larger but some of the materials have a II Zone of 30m
Verified.
Currently, this is the output generated from the ERG widget:
I can see 3 distinct areas
This is a nice example; the areas are represented with varying transparency, but the output graphic is still uniform and it doesn't block out basemap elements: