Closed MichaelZeiler closed 5 years ago
so far 99% of the feedback on risers has been they should not be a network feature, as they are a structure. I understand why Tom wanted them, but they are confusing to our BP's and Customers, except for Bruce Berkie. Also, the Riser as Tom defined it was for connecting Overhead to underground. In this case, the Underground line is connected directly to the fuse, so the Line End would be more consistent.
Lines Ends - John will revise the model, they will just be Line End: Line End. Phase info will be removed: https://github.com/ArcGIS/utility-network-configurations/issues/1004
Risers - Modeling and discussion ongoing, this topic needs some more discussion
I modified this configuration to what I understand is the new riser model. (I did not update the key yet) @jalsup please review
If the riser is inside the assembly, is an attachment needed?
yes, as this is a different circuit section the riser needs the structural attachment to the pole.
Ok, that leads me to conclude the riser is outside the assembly, because our pattern is that everything inside an assembly inherits attachment associations
Updated the key to be type-consistent with the drawing.
@jalsup, a couple of things: there are no conduit types in your AG/AT spreadsheet, so I made up a type for the diagram. Also, the low voltage UG line for 3ph service can't be duplex or triplex (I believe) so I made it quadraplex
Hi @MichaelZeiler, we agreed with Tom to change the Triplex, Quadraplex, etc to just Overhead and Underground. The diagram should be updated to reflect that. I will look at the issue of conduit later today.
I created a graphic from the overhead three phase wye transformer from the PPT, but I see three modeling issues: