Ready for Google Fonts :)

I think we can't do better in terms of report !

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.7.27

[1] Family checks

🔥 FAIL: Do we have the latest version of FontBakery installed?

* [com.google.fonts/check/fontbakery_version](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/fontbakery_version) * 🔥 **FAIL** Unable to detect what's the latest version of FontBakery available. Maybe we're offline? Please check Internet access and try again.

[1] Epilogue-Italic[wght].ttf

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

* [com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[1] Epilogue[wght].ttf

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	1	2	150	14	169	0
0%	0%	1%	45%	4%	50%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
INFO
PASS
DEBUG

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.7.27

[1] Family checks

🔥 FAIL: Do we have the latest version of FontBakery installed?

[2] Epilogue-Black.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

* ⚠ **WARN** This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct. The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 [code: contour-count]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-BlackItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-Bold.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-BoldItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-ExtraBold.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-ExtraBoldItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-ExtraLight.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

* ⚠ **WARN** This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct. The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 [code: contour-count]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-ExtraLightItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

* ⚠ **WARN** This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct. The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 [code: contour-count]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-Italic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-Light.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-LightItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-Medium.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-MediumItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-Regular.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-SemiBold.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-SemiBoldItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-Thin.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

* ⚠ **WARN** This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct. The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 [code: contour-count]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

[2] Epilogue-ThinItalic.ttf

⚠ WARN: Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

* [com.google.fonts/check/contour_count](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/contour_count)

--- Rationale ---

Visually QAing thousands of glyphs by hand is tiring. Most glyphs can only be
constructured in a handful of ways. This means a glyph's contour count will
only differ slightly amongst different fonts, e.g a 'g' could either be 2 or 3
contours, depending on whether its double story or single story.

However, a quotedbl should have 2 contours, unless the font belongs to a
display family.

This check currently does not cover variable fonts because there's plenty of
alternative ways of constructing glyphs with multiple outlines for each feature
in a VarFont. The expected contour count data for this check is currently
optimized for the typical construction of glyphs in static fonts.

* ⚠ **WARN** This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct. The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours: Glyph name: currency Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni20AD Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni1E1C Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: currency Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 Glyph name: uni0228 Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 Glyph name: uni01E5 Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 [code: contour-count]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

--- Rationale ---

Fonts with ligatures should have kerning on the corresponding non-ligated
sequences for text where ligatures aren't used (eg
https://github.com/impallari/Raleway/issues/14).

* ⚠ **WARN** GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences: - f + f - f + i - i + f - f + l - l + f - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]

Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	1	36	1369	108	1398	0
0%	0%	1%	47%	4%	48%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
INFO
PASS
DEBUG

Etcetera-Type-Co / Epilogue