Eugenetanwl3881 / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Sorting by descending order should be implemented since it is useful #12

Open Eugenetanwl3881 opened 1 year ago

Eugenetanwl3881 commented 1 year ago

Sorting by descending order, especially for price is useful. I understand that UG has mentioned this, hence I will consider it Very Low severity. Could mention in future extensions

soc-pe-bot commented 1 year ago

Team's Response

Thank for your suggestion. Indeed the feature of sorting by descending order does hold some values when sorting for price attribute. However, for the most other attributes like names, number of orders, due dates and etc, the descending order sort is generally not practically useful. Hence after considering the effort that we need to put in to implement the feature and its useability, and also the fact the user could use the sort ascending function that we have carefully designed and implemented to achieve the same goal, we feel that this feature is nice to have but not must have for iteration v1.4, therefore we regard this issue as not in scope.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]