codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
5837eda) 93.65% compared to head (982ec85) 93.65%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## 0.1.9 #119 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.65% 93.65% ======================================= Files 244 244 Lines 5514 5514 ======================================= Hits 5164 5164 Misses 350 350 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Eve-ning/reamberPy/pull/119?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Evening) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [reamber/algorithms/analysis/scroll\_speed.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Eve-ning/reamberPy/pull/119?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Evening#diff-cmVhbWJlci9hbGdvcml0aG1zL2FuYWx5c2lzL3Njcm9sbF9zcGVlZC5weQ==) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...ests/algorithm\_tests/generate/test\_sv\_normalize.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Eve-ning/reamberPy/pull/119?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Evening#diff-dGVzdHMvYWxnb3JpdGhtX3Rlc3RzL2dlbmVyYXRlL3Rlc3Rfc3Zfbm9ybWFsaXplLnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...ests/algorithm\_tests/analysis/test\_scroll\_speed.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/Eve-ning/reamberPy/pull/119?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Evening#diff-dGVzdHMvYWxnb3JpdGhtX3Rlc3RzL2FuYWx5c2lzL3Rlc3Rfc2Nyb2xsX3NwZWVkLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Major Changes
scroll_speedanalysis behaviour to include BPM implicit 1.0 SV logic.