Closed colin-ho closed 1 week ago
We return a DaftResult<&str> for expression names, but currently there's no case that would raise an error. Having the return type as &str should be sufficient.
DaftResult<&str>
&str
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 85.59%. Comparing base (da991c5) to head (ac5ee6e).
da991c5
ac5ee6e
We return a
DaftResult<&str>
for expression names, but currently there's no case that would raise an error. Having the return type as&str
should be sufficient.