Closed SWITCHconsortium closed 2 years ago
@SWITCHconsortium, I'm unable to replicate that behavior. Can you confirm that my test matches your scenario?
Does that somewhat parallel your scenario?
Thanks...
Thanks for following up! You helped me figure out what was wrong – our role assignment rules did not have any parameters! To be fair, we do not assign roles by job category so we have never needed to worry about it being wrong. In any event, problem solved!
Thanks for creating and sharing this Cloud App!
Katie
From: mgobat @.> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 1:42 PM To: ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load @.> Cc: Katie Utschig @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load] User role assignment - Internal Roles (Issue #75)
@SWITCHconsortiumhttps://github.com/SWITCHconsortium, I'm unable to replicate that behavior. Can you confirm that my test matches your scenario?
Does that somewhat parallel your scenario?
Thanks...
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load/issues/75#issuecomment-1171553806, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUBGRR6O3MIODET3ASJUK33VRXS6TANCNFSM5Z67EKTQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@SWITCHconsortium, glad you are back in business. Be on a lookout for an update adding the "Job Description" field soon (#74).
Many thanks!!!
From: mgobat @.> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 3:06 PM To: ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load @.> Cc: Katie Utschig @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load] User role assignment - Internal Roles (Issue #75)
@SWITCHconsortiumhttps://github.com/SWITCHconsortium, glad you are back in business. Be on a lookout for an update adding the "Job Description" field soon (#74https://github.com/ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load/issues/74).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ExLibrisGroup/alma-csv-user-load/issues/75#issuecomment-1171627083, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUBGRR3LCGVE6E62776TDO3VRX43TANCNFSM5Z67EKTQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Our Automatic Role Assignment rules for imported users are based on Job Category with a default rule to create a Patron role in the absence of a job category. When I loaded a set of internal users with no job category, they were assigned all of the enabled roles. If I make all of the enabled roles inactive, only the patron role is created? Is this perhaps some sort of bug?
I tried adding job category as a field and making the default empty.