Open kara-mela opened 3 months ago
The techniques 'luminescence', 'fluorescence luminescence', and 'x-ray excited optical luminescence' (XEOL) are not related via subclasses. Currently, they are all direct subclasses of ‘visible photon emission technique’, which has no other subclasses. I recommend to use 'luminescence' as an intermediate class between ‘visible photon emission technique’ and 'fluorescence luminescence'/XEOL.
Certainly this can be added.
Are there ‘visible photon emission technique’ other than ‘luminescence’?
Quite possibly
Additionally, 'fluorescence luminescence', and XEOL are currently not listed in ‘defined by experimental probe’. Is there a reason for that?
Probably not!
The techniques 'luminescence', 'fluorescence luminescence', and 'x-ray excited optical luminescence' (XEOL) are not related via subclasses. Currently, they are all direct subclasses of ‘visible photon emission technique’, which has no other subclasses. I recommend to use 'luminescence' as an intermediate class between ‘visible photon emission technique’ and 'fluorescence luminescence'/XEOL.
Are there ‘visible photon emission technique’ other than ‘luminescence’?
Additionally, 'fluorescence luminescence', and XEOL are currently not listed in ‘defined by experimental probe’. Is there a reason for that?