Closed paulroberts68 closed 8 years ago
Proposed solution: Prerequisites, requirements and assumptions:
The workflow works like this:
@watkinspd @kelpisland , see my proposal for lab implementation above. Question: what is the value proposition of the lab comparing to some other public DevOps application hosting offerings such as Heroku which has a free tier?
@f-w I think the main value prop in that case is the "namespace" for public sector developers. It offers the clear expectation that this work is not production but still approved for public collaboration. What we get (dev exchange) is a more consistent experience across projects and offer a helping hand to getting things off the ground quickly.
What's the sense of the size of this?
Size/capacity is a concern because:
Given that, it's probably necessary not only to limit who can create instances but how many instances an authorized person is allowed to create. I'm thinking 3-5 is probably a good number.
I'm closing this issue as the work has been superseded by openshift
Part of the lab value prop is to speed up the deployment of new code so that program owners can collaborate efficiently with developers. This will become particularly useful for accepting code when using the pay for pull process.
Created by Fred/Peter
DOD