Closed ss199514 closed 3 months ago
@ss199514 did you re-test these PDBs and get higher occupancies? The deposited occupancies for many of these ligands are less than 1. Was the sum of occupancies closer to 0.5 or higher? Just trying to figure out if we should close this issue or not.
Re-worked with @jessicaflowers changes
Describe the bug qfit_ligand is consistently assigning occupancies in the range of 0.2-0.35 for >40 PDBs (5-6 different datasets). It assigned an occupancy of 0.2 for the majority of these datasets.
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Step 1--> Fetch files
Use get_structures.sh (phenix.fetch_pdb –mtz)
Step 2--> Running ready set
Original.pdb (from the PDB fetched ^^)
Step 3--> Generate composite omit map
phenix.composite_omit_map original.pdb phenix_fetch_sf.mtz ../ready_set/*.ligands.cif input.xray_data.labels=FOBS,SIGFOBS input.xray_data.r_free_flags.label=R-free-flags
Step 4--> Run qfit_ligand
qfit_ligand composite_omit_map.mtz -l 2FOFCWT,PH2FOFCWT original.pdb chain,number
Expected behavior An inspection of the occupancies assigned by qfit_ligand will show that it's skewed towards ~0.2
Additional context Examples structures to test this on: 7ZWO,7ZWP,7ZWQ,7ZWR,7ZWS,7ZWT,7ZWU,7ZWV,7ZWW,7ZWX,7ZWY,7ZWZ
Software & OS Version:
Attach files:
v3.2.0_multiconformer_A_201.txt