As noted in some of the test code, I still think the current CCTBX-based transformer needs some fine-tuning - however in the future I think the (slower) FFT version should be used as a reference implementation for comparison, since it shares much of the same underlying code and is very well-validated.
As noted in some of the test code, I still think the current CCTBX-based transformer needs some fine-tuning - however in the future I think the (slower) FFT version should be used as a reference implementation for comparison, since it shares much of the same underlying code and is very well-validated.