Closed MaxMustermann2 closed 5 months ago
the recipient
is later added as a feature: staker could specify a destination address(an EOA address or a contract address) as recipient address. If we remove this argument, we would disable this feature. So it depends on whether we need this feature
Currently, our claim function is as follows.
However, it should be changed to this.
This is to reduce the attack vector, and align with the advice that Exocore acts a trust-minimized L1 and that the withdrawal address equals the deposit address for all stakers.