Expensify / App

Welcome to New Expensify: a complete re-imagination of financial collaboration, centered around chat. Help us build the next generation of Expensify by sharing feedback and contributing to the code.
https://new.expensify.com
MIT License
3.14k stars 2.64k forks source link

[HOLD for payment 2024-03-20] [TS migration] Migrate 'MoneyRequestConfirmationList.js' component to TypeScript #25138

Closed melvin-bot[bot] closed 3 months ago

melvin-bot[bot] commented 11 months ago

TypeScript migration

Make sure you read through our TypeScript's style guide, cheatsheet and PropTypes conversion table before you start working on this migration issue.

Files

Path Dependencies
src/components/MoneyRequestConfirmationList.js 33
melvin-bot[bot] commented 10 months ago

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

melvin-bot[bot] commented 8 months ago

@melvin-bot[bot], this Monthly task hasn't been acted upon in 6 weeks; closing.

If you disagree, feel encouraged to reopen it -- but pick your least important issue to close instead.

kubabutkiewicz commented 6 months ago

Hi, I'm Jakub from Callstack - expert contributor group - and I would like to take a look at this issue.

melvin-bot[bot] commented 5 months ago

Triggered auto assignment to @AndrewGable, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Triggered auto assignment to @greg-schroeder (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

AndrewGable commented 4 months ago

FYI this PR caused too many regressions and we are going to revert it. I'd be happy to review the next PR that addresses these issues.

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 1.4.45-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-07. :confetti_ball:

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

greg-schroeder commented 4 months ago

Wait so this is still going to be reverted @AndrewGable? I saw it was deployed to prod anyway so I am a bit confused

AndrewGable commented 4 months ago

It was reverted and was not deployed

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Skipping the payment summary for this issue since all the assignees are employees or vendors. If this is incorrect, please manually add the payment summary SO.

kubabutkiewicz commented 4 months ago

@hoangzinh @AndrewGable PR is ready to check 😄

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 1.4.51-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-20. :confetti_ball:

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

melvin-bot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Skipping the payment summary for this issue since all the assignees are employees or vendors. If this is incorrect, please manually add the payment summary SO.

greg-schroeder commented 3 months ago

Apologies, I was OOO last week. Taking a look at this now!

greg-schroeder commented 3 months ago

Closing per https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/25138#issuecomment-2010410827

hoangzinh commented 3 months ago

@greg-schroeder oh I was assigned to review the PR https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/37716. Could you help to process a payment for me? Then we're fine to close it.

greg-schroeder commented 3 months ago

Sent you an offer

hoangzinh commented 3 months ago

@greg-schroeder Thanks. But TS migration usually has 250$ as a standard rate. Will you send another offer or will adjust the amount when payout?

greg-schroeder commented 3 months ago

@hoangzinh Ugh, I always forget to change it when I do custom offers (that's the default rate) - I've adjusted it.

hoangzinh commented 3 months ago

Accepted. Thanks @greg-schroeder