Closed melvin-bot[bot] closed 7 months ago
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue.
P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!
@melvin-bot[bot], this Monthly task hasn't been acted upon in 6 weeks; closing.
If you disagree, feel encouraged to reopen it -- but pick your least important issue to close instead.
I am Ruben Rebelo from Callstack - expert contributor group. I’d like to work on this job.
📣 @ruben-rebelo! 📣 Hey, it seems we don’t have your contributor details yet! You'll only have to do this once, and this is how we'll hire you on Upwork. Please follow these steps:
Contributor details
Your Expensify account email: <REPLACE EMAIL HERE>
Upwork Profile Link: <REPLACE LINK HERE>
Triggered auto assignment to @techievivek, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.
@techievivek Could you assign me and add the BZ to the issue? Thanks!
Triggered auto assignment to @laurenreidexpensify (NewFeature
), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.
⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
Both blocker seems already handled, but it is a regression from the TS refactor.
Reviewing
label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".
The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 1.4.40-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-02-20. :confetti_ball:
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
another regression https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/36443
Not eligible for payment until regression is fixed
[Upwork Job]()
PR for regression in review - https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/36998
regression PR in QA
Not overdue, regression PR is merged and deployed to staging.
PR is on prod as of today 29.02.24 - payment now due 07.03.24
Payment due on Thurs
Not overdue, payment will be done today. CC @laurenreidexpensify
Payment Summary:
C+ @mollfpr $250 offer sent via Upwork Contributor: @ruben-rebelo is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
Thank you @laurenreidexpensify I'll do manual request in NewDot!
[Upwork Job]()
Payment Summary:
C+ @mollfpr $250 to be requested in newdot Contributor: @ruben-rebelo is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
$250 approved for @mollfpr based on summary.
TypeScript migration
Make sure you read through our TypeScript's style guide, cheatsheet and PropTypes conversion table before you start working on this migration issue.
Files
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @laurenreidexpensify