Closed izarutskaya closed 2 weeks ago
Triggered auto assignment to @flodnv (DeployBlockerCash
), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.
Triggered auto assignment to @strepanier03 (Bug
), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.
:wave: Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive โฑ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
@strepanier03 I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.
We think this issue might be related to the #vip-vsb.
I believe this is not a blocker anymore as we have just deployed
@izarutskaya @kavimuru can you please retest on latest staging and production to confirm this is a blocker?
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0110d03c8ecb36a282
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @c3024 (External
)
This was repro in 1.4.63-13
based on the OP so going to remove the deploy blocker label as this version is current production.
Looking for proposals
I'm unable to reproduce this issue.
๐ฃ @proverbed! ๐ฃ Hey, it seems we donโt have your contributor details yet! You'll only have to do this once, and this is how we'll hire you on Upwork. Please follow these steps:
Contributor details
Your Expensify account email: <REPLACE EMAIL HERE>
Upwork Profile Link: <REPLACE LINK HERE>
Contributor details Your Expensify account email: dmitriwarren@gmail.com Upwork Profile Link: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01a6a5c1a5c91b87e1
โ Contributor details stored successfully. Thank you for contributing to Expensify!
Unable to test this today but it's on my todo for tomorrow.
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
I was able to test this but could not reproduce the behavior either.
However, when my desktop user comes online, the deleted expense is removed entirely and there is no RBR either.
Still unable to repro so added label and requested retest.
This has been labelled "Needs Reproduction". Follow the steps here: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/16989
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
Setting to weekly during retesting.
@flodnv, @strepanier03, @c3024 Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
Issue is reproducible during KI retests.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/43995119/264c17fa-f575-4050-8c2c-a2e5b668f381
@flodnv @strepanier03 @c3024 this issue is now 4 weeks old, please consider:
Thanks!
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
Thank you @mvtglobally!
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
@c3024 , can you take a look at
Repro steps are near identical. Can you review that issue and comment here or there with any thoughts? Normally we'd keep the older issue open but it looks like both these have quite a few comments (and no suggested proposals). At a minimum, I think, we should bump this up to $500 since the other is.
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
@mallenexpensify
The blinking part is not reproducible any more.
In my opinion this behaviour of disappearing of the deleted request on going online is fine and need not be fixed.
I checked both the issues. Backend sends the response for deleting the request.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/102477862/a0233892-28b0-41da-865d-6821755360db
So, if we need to fix this, this needs to be Internal
.
@flodnv think we should make it internal or close it?
I got lost in this very old issue, can someone please restate the latest problem statement as experienced by the end user?
๐ฃ It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? ๐ธ
Putting this on hold pending
Still holding
Closing as we're closing #vip-split
If you havenโt already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 1.4.63-13 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: N Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Issue reported by: Applause-Internal team
Action Performed:
Preconditions: 2 users are logged in Expensify via web and desktop.
Expected Result:
The deleted IOU should not disappear for desktop user. RBR appear when user go online.
Actual Result:
The deleted IOU not disappear for desktop user. RBR appear when user go online. 'Hm.. it' s not here' start blinking in IOU report.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/115492554/04827b83-6aaf-4d7e-8fe8-5e4af3f92a13
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit