Closed shawnborton closed 1 month ago
Sure, I can take it!
List looks good to me!
Awesome, thanks Filip!
I'll assign and be the BZ on this one.
Current assignee @trjExpensify is eligible for the NewFeature assigner, not assigning anyone new.
:warning: It looks like this issue is labelled as a New Feature but not tied to any GitHub Project. Keep in mind that all new features should be tied to GitHub Projects in order to properly track external CAP software time :warning:
Triggered auto assignment to Design team member for new feature review - @shawnborton (NewFeature
)
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01832a2280e70e929a
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @ikevin127 (External
)
Added External
to get a C+ assigned for the PR review, removed Help wanted
as we don't need contributor proposals for this job. 👍
@shawnborton, @trjExpensify, @ikevin127, @filip-solecki Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!
Filip, you're still going to take this one right?
Yes, I am going to work on this on Monday
Not overdue, we're currently on track with starting work on this new feature as per the comment above.
Yes, I am going to work on this on Monday
Great stuff, thanks Filip!
Not overdue, we're currently on track with starting work on this new feature as per https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/45451#issuecomment-2240915521.
Can anyone confirm if I can access this page by:
Start new chat
buttonOr should I create it using #rooms
tab?
cc @shawnborton @trjExpensify
In that particular example, we're talking about when you make a chat with multiple people (not a #room
).
So you are correct in your steps you laid out.
Ok, thanks, draft PR is almost finished, I'll open it tomorrow morning and it'll include all listed pages 🚀
Triggered auto assignment to @jasperhuangg, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.
⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.
If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.
If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.
Reviewing
label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".
The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 9.0.15-9 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-08-09. :confetti_ball:
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
NewFeature
Note: This new feature is only visible / testable in narrow layout devices on the following platforms:
Do we agree 👍 or 👎.
There is a bug. Please take a look - https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/46096#issuecomment-2273409940.
@rezkiy37 Thanks! That'll get handled in the fix PR https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/46698
cc @trjExpensify For payment, in case this fell off your radar.
Note: There were regressions with this one, so payment should be halved, @jasperhuangg to confirm!
Yep! Payment summary as follows:
Regression tests for the Search project will be handled centrally. Offer sent.
@trjExpensify Offer accepted, thank you!
Paid, closing!
Now that we've successfully implemented selection mode for the Search page, we'd like to reuse this same UX for all table rows that can be found on mobile. In order to do this, we will want to remove the checkboxes from all mobile tables and implement the same long-press to enable selection mode.
Here's a running list of the tables we'd want to update on mobile:
Note that for #rooms, we first need to update the members list to look more like the table style found in Groups first, and then we should make this change. We can handle that separately.
cc @Expensify/design @trjExpensify - can you think of anymore places?
Also cc @filip-solecki in case you want to take this one as a follow up. Thanks!
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @trjExpensify