Open m-natarajan opened 2 weeks ago
Triggered auto assignment to @JmillsExpensify (Bug
), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.
This has been labelled "Needs Reproduction". Follow the steps here: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/16989
Asked in thread for more details around the reports.
Commenting to keep an eye on this. This should have been fixed w/ these PRs:
Basically as of these PRs, the expense reports should be showing in the LHN AS LONG AS all of these are true:
Assigning @Beamanator based on his theory above.
Will get to this today 🙏
PR is up! ^
@JmillsExpensify Could I get assigned here for payment as the PR reviewer? Thanks!
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: Reproducible in staging?: Needs Reproduction Reproducible in production?: Needs Reproduction If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: @coleaeason Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1726515980761009
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Approver A should be removed from the workspace chat, but they should retain the report from the submitter in LHN with GBR.
Actual Result for @coleaeason:
Approver A doesn't have the report in LHN. The report shows when searched for and shows as GBR when it's in his LHN after searching.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
View all open jobs on GitHub