Open thienlnam opened 2 hours ago
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021836917539166842207
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @suneox (External
)
Triggered auto assignment to @trjExpensify (Bug
), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.
I simulated the customer steps here by signing-up on Classic and turning my network to crappy 3G:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a38646e7-4566-4af6-82ae-740a010c511c
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: v9.0.38-4 Reproducible in staging?: Y Reproducible in production?: Y If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: @anmurali Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C036QM0SLJK/p1726787640487449
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
There should not be an optimistic concierge chat created
Actual Result:
Sometimes, there are two concierge chats that persist. The actual one, and then the optimistic one Other times, the optimistic one disappears
Workaround:
Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
[Internal] Here are the two FS sessions https://fsty.io/v/yjbdRZ5H https://fsty.io/v/q9bsx2kv
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @suneox