Closed timofeymukha closed 6 months ago
Excellent example! We could use this nicely in teaching! One simple comment: shoukdnt we call it convecting cone?
Excellent example! We could use this nicely in teaching! One simple comment: shoukdnt we call it convecting cone?
Thanks, Philipp! Maybe advected_cone
since we call it advection in the code?
yes. advecting (or advected) is in principle better. Gottlieb and Orszag (1977) where the problem originated, called it convecting cone. So perhaps then advecting cone? Knowing that advected would be better.
yes. advecting (or advected) is in principle better. Gottlieb and Orszag (1977) where the problem originated, called it convecting cone. So perhaps then advecting cone? Knowing that advected would be better.
Changed to advecting cone!
Can we merge?
This is an example used both P. Fischer and by the Nektar++ folks to demonstrate the benefit of high order. A cone is placed in a vortex and advected a single revolution. At the end, we look at the form of the cone and see if it is preserved.