change the order of the items, first node data then edge data.
Node data: I recommend avoiding the term 'argument attacking network' in both the node and edge data explanations since the output is a data table, not a graph. In the 'node data' explanation, you can simply state that it contains arguments(or reviews) based on a chosen topic. As for the 'additional column,' it would be helpful if you could specify the name of this column since I couldn't locate it in the figure(or in the text).
Edge data: describe that the data table contains the following columns: source, target, and weight. It would be helpful to include a link explaining the meaning of these columns, or you can clarify here that 'source' and 'target' correspond to review IDs (argument IDs) and represent connections from the review with ID 'source' to the review with ID 'target.' The 'weight' column denotes the weight assigned to each (source, target) link, as calculated here.
change the order of the items, first node data then edge data.
Node data: I recommend avoiding the term 'argument attacking network' in both the node and edge data explanations since the output is a data table, not a graph. In the 'node data' explanation, you can simply state that it contains arguments(or reviews) based on a chosen topic. As for the 'additional column,' it would be helpful if you could specify the name of this column since I couldn't locate it in the figure(or in the text).
Edge data: describe that the data table contains the following columns: source, target, and weight. It would be helpful to include a link explaining the meaning of these columns, or you can clarify here that 'source' and 'target' correspond to review IDs (argument IDs) and represent connections from the review with ID 'source' to the review with ID 'target.' The 'weight' column denotes the weight assigned to each (source, target) link, as calculated here.