Eyez0nly / omeglespy-z

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/omeglespy-z
0 stars 0 forks source link

error on boot #33

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.ran omeglespy-z batch - flashed by first word was error.
2.double clicked omeglespy-z-desktop-2.0.0-BETA-003.jar - nothing happened
3.cmd line opend omeglespy-z-desktop-2.0.0-BETA-003.jar, java was loading then 
error missing file.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
expected the program to open, error from java

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
omeglespy-z-desktop-2.0.0-BETA-003, win 7 sp1. java 7 update 5

Please provide any additional information below.
i have run omegle spy before it was picked up by omeglespyx. had no problems. 
not sure what i'm doing wrong

Original issue reported on code.google.com by psyco.pr...@gmail.com on 3 Aug 2012 at 6:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Working fine for me on windows 7 32 bit with java 7.

Please attach a screen shot of the output you get when running via cmd.

Also, 32 or 64 bit windows?

In cmd run

  java -version

Attach a screenshot of the output.

Original comment by darkimp...@gmail.com on 4 Aug 2012 at 2:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I got my hands on a 64 bit machine running Windows 7 and both the 32 and 64 bit 
versions of the java 6 (1.6.0_14-b08).

- Double clicking on the .JAR executes the application successfully.
- Executing the command from the command line (java -jar 
omeglespy-z-desktop-2.0.0-BETA-003.jar) executes the application successfully.
- Executing the command from the command line 
(omeglespy-z-desktop-2.0.0-BETA-003.jar) executes the application successfully.
- Neither of the included batch files works (these are going to be removed in 
the final version anyway).

I do not plan on uninstalling/reinstalling different versions/architectures of 
the JVM to substantiate this issue. I recommend that any users facing this 
issue have installed the 64 bit version of the JRE (any of java 1.5 through 
1.7). If this does not solve the issue, please report the behavior here.

Original comment by darkimp...@gmail.com on 11 Aug 2012 at 3:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Closing this defect. I am unable to reproduce it.

If the original reporter or anyone else still has this issue, please re-open 
the defect.

Original comment by darkimp...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2012 at 9:26