Closed neozoolook closed 6 years ago
@neozoolook this appears to have been added as a measure to better report errors. I will revert it though as it seems to have broken your work.
@neozoolook try now
Thanks will test first thing in AM.
On Jun 5, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Tim Rupp notifications@github.com wrote:
@neozoolook https://github.com/neozoolook try now
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/F5Networks/f5-ansible/issues/746#issuecomment-394879209, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZF_Z51iuizvdSW7w12If-6IP4qLsig6ks5t5wRdgaJpZM4UbooX.
@caphrim007 works like a champ, thanks again!
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
bigip_command.py
ANSIBLE VERSION
PYTHON VERSION
BIGIP VERSION
LIBRARY VERSIONS
CONFIGURATION
Standard ansible.cfg file.
OS / ENVIRONMENT
Ubuntu 16.04TS
SUMMARY
We had some playbooks written leveraging the bigip_command module that worked fine, however updates to the module code appear to have broken the use of faking idempotency in the playbook structure. The first portion will run a command to check to see if the configuration exists, register results then only run the create command when the 'was not found' string was seen from first command.
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
EXPECTED RESULTS
Looking at -vvvv outputs we can see that 'was not found' is sent out, however second portion of the play fails as error.
ACTUAL RESULTS