It would be convenient to document the following in the flow-chart for CIS-FIC:
indicate a text description indicating that the CIS creates the CR always in the kube-system namespace, independently of where the CIS and IPAM instances are deployed
indicate explicitly that CIS and FC need to be in the same namespace directory
indicate explicitly that if it is desired to share FC amongst several CIS instances, for the same or different BIG-IPs, these all need to be in the same namespace
The diagram doesn´t show the right name for the F5IPAM resource created by CIS, it has the following format instead: <deployment>.<namespace>.ipam as shown next
[cloud-user@ocp-provisioner routes-bigip]$ oc get ipams.fic.f5.com -A
NAMESPACE NAME AGE
kube-system k8s-bigip1-ctlr-deployment.sc-twotier.ipam 5m35s
Title
[DOC] IPAM CR usage and multiple-CIS use case
Description
It would be convenient to document the following in the flow-chart for CIS-FIC:
<deployment>.<namespace>.ipam
as shown next