search

FAIR-IMPACT / MOD

Metadata for Ontology Description and Publication Ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
20 stars 8 forks source link

Mod 1.4 #19

Closed biswanathdutta closed 5 years ago

biswanathdutta commented 5 years ago

Please provide your feedback.

jonquet commented 5 years ago

For the dct:Creator > dc:creator changes... I recall we decided to stay within dct and not dc. What's the motivartion betweem this change ? Harmonization ... I would have change all dc to dct as discussed.

Note that I don't understand why we still have other dc properties also (title, contributor, etc).... I thought we were supposed to have only dct everywhere.

biswanathdutta commented 5 years ago

For the dct:Creator > dc:creator changes... I recall we decided to stay within dct and not dc. What's the motivartion betweem this change ? Harmonization ... I would have change all dc to dct as discussed.

Note that I don't understand why we still have other dc properties also (title, contributor, etc).... I thought we were supposed to have only dct everywhere.

Moved back to dct.

Also, to clarify the following doubt "Why are the DCT property defined with upper case caracter ?" A note has been provided illustrating the reason.

biswanathdutta commented 5 years ago

.

biswanathdutta commented 5 years ago

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:28 PM Clement Jonquet notifications@github.com wrote:

@jonquet commented on this pull request.

Another general comment: maybe we could move to Turtle as the default syntax... I think we are the only last 2 to work with XML/RDF ;)

If you agree, we can go for Turtle. This will make our life easier.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/pull/19#pullrequestreview-172370977, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVmzkwb4RhGLyNVGTpDOeDBrNUTCZ7mbks5uspKMgaJpZM4YR4kg .

biswanathdutta commented 5 years ago

On Wed 7 Nov, 2018, 1:24 PM Clement Jonquet <notifications@github.com wrote:

@jonquet commented on this pull request.

Thinking about it more and looking at what have been done by the DC folks, I would suggest we change our pav:derivedFrom to rdfs:isDefinedBy and we provide the versionIRI of MOD in which a property as been imported. Check out the defintions of properties inside DC: http://dublincore.org/2012/06/14/dcelements#description They use: dcterms:description, dcterms:hasVersion, dcterms:issued, dcterms:modified, rdfs:comment, rdfs:isDefinedBy, rdfs:label, skos:note to describe their properties

Yes, I agree, in fact, initially we used rdfs:isDefinedBy for the stated purpose.

So, if you agree, I can change it back to rdfs: isDefinedBy. And the values will be the URIs.

Another thing, see DC folks used rdfs:comment to capture the resource definition. They used dcterms:description only to capture the additional descriptions of the resource.

—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/pull/19#pullrequestreview-172369939, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVmzk9lhRvm7xaMjpSXWlO1DvIY7V5mdks5uspGagaJpZM4YR4kg .

biswanathdutta commented 5 years ago

On Wed 7 Nov, 2018, 1:16 PM Clement Jonquet <notifications@github.com wrote:

@jonquet commented on this pull request.

Line 26: Don't are supposed to have a comlete description of MOD owl:Ontology object with MOD1.4 properties ? Or at least a maximum number of them ?

Yes, agree. Will update. Also, need to update the MOD description itself. So far, did not look at it carefully. Tomorrow, discuss on this.

—

You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/pull/19#pullrequestreview-172368215, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVmzkymRhClbsG7ViXvhXkdMTEzurEtHks5uso_egaJpZM4YR4kg .