Closed marcosabda closed 1 month ago
Hi, Yes you can do this (annotation properties). The current version is 1.4 see the profile in the branch: https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/blob/mod-1.4/mod-1.4-profile.rdfs
It shows how to use annotation properties and copy/paste the properties you would like to use in your ontology.
Dear Jonquet,
Thank you very much. I will look into it soon.
Best regards, Marco
Dr Marco Cinelli Marie Curie Global Research Fellow
(Current location) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL), Cincinnati, OH, USA
Laboratory of Intelligent Decision Support Systems Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, Poland
Guest Teacher Department of Management London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
My website https://sites.google.com/view/marcocinelli | Google Scholar profile https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=UrnXLb8AAAAJ&hl=en | LinkedIn profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/macinelli/
On 4 Jul 2019, at 00:24, Clement Jonquet notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi, Yes you can do this (annotation properties). Teh current version is 1.4 see the profile in the branch: https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/blob/mod-1.4/mod-1.4-profile.rdfs https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/blob/mod-1.4/mod-1.4-profile.rdfs It shows how to use annotation properties and copy/paste the properties you would like to use in your ontology.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology/issues/22?email_source=notifications&email_token=ALEG54GDM2YXHENI3DTHIP3P5WQSZA5CNFSM4H5NYYT2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZGSC6Q#issuecomment-508371322, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALEG54FCFNUY53IJIVIWWETP5WQSZANCNFSM4H5NYYTQ.
Hi, we would like to know how it is possible to use the MOD ontology to describe an existing ontology. One idea we considered is to use the MOD properties as annotation properties in our ontology. Would this make sense? Do you have any other ideas? Thank you. Marco