Closed smrgeoinfo closed 5 months ago
Thanks @smrgeoinfo for spotting that. You are right - we're revising MOD as part of the FAIR-IMPACT project and we will make sure to fix this (we are working for version MOD 2.1)
This is the link to the line you refer to: https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD/blob/8a27405be5dbf19e4ea1a2b1a3c25c4d6615c55e/mod-v2.0_ontology.owl#L3045
Can I also point you to the design decisions discussions? https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD/discussions
It would be great to get your views.
Assigning @biswanathdutta as he is the person that have produced the mod-v2.0_ontology.owl
I do confirm @agbeltran 's point on the fact that we are re-taking all of this in v2.1
in mod-v2.0_ontology.owl, there are the following statements, but no declaration of :SemanticArtefact. I assume its' supposed to be mod:SemanticArtefact. This is breaking. ?maybe mod-v2.0_ontology.owl is deprecated???
@smrgeoinfo Yes, it is mod:SemanticArtefact.
On MOD owl file on GitHub, you are right. Prefix "mod" is missed out for the class descriptions of mod:Taxonomy, mod:Terminology, and mod:Thesaurus.
We will fix this issue.
@agbeltran @jonquet
thanks @biswanathdutta @jonquet
but the problem that was raised was that the SemanticArtefact class was not defined in version 2.0
I've now created a pull request to resolve this issue, and of course, we will keep it and add more details in 3.0
This issue has been fixed in https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD/pull/55 - and the SemanticArtefact class and definition will also be available for version 3.0
in mod-v2.0_ontology.owl, there are the following statements, but no declaration of :SemanticArtefact. I assume its' supposed to be mod:SemanticArtefact. This is breaking. ?maybe mod-v2.0_ontology.owl is deprecated???
line 3045:
https://w3id.org/mod#Taxonomy
mod:Taxonomy rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :SemanticArtefact .
https://w3id.org/mod#Terminology
mod:Terminology rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :SemanticArtefact .