The JERM Ontology is an application ontology designed to describe the items in SEEK and the relationships between them (for example, data, models, experiment descriptions, results, samples, protocols, standard operating procedures and publications); and to enable these relationships to be expressed with formal semantics.
(As mentioned in #4): how can the JERM Ontology's ISA relations be aligned with the official http://isa-tools.github.io/linkedISA/ ?
Somehow their http://purl.org/isaterms is broken - but they are also at https://github.com/ISA-tools/linkedISA-ontologies
I was looking at Alejandra's https://doi.org/10.5524/100148 which has code like:
so presumably our http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#hasPart is equivalent (or sub property) of the generic http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000050 ("part of") and types like http://purl.org/isaterms/study and http://purl.org/isaterms/investigation (notice lowercase for some reason) are (somewhat) equivalent to our http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#Study and http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#Investigation
But I don't find any http://purl.org/isaterms mapping in https://github.com/FAIRdom/JERMOntology/blob/master/JERM.owl
Would a direct mapping be feasible - or is the linkedISA structure more complicated than the view we have in JERM?