search

FAIRiCUBE / catalog

Containing meta-data about the data collections available within FAIRiCUBE, both core ones as well as the ones provided by users
https://catalog.fairicube.eu/
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 2 forks source link

Resolution on time axis should not show for non-regular axis #30

Closed misev closed 3 months ago

misev commented 4 months ago

When the "regular ?" on Time Axis is unchecked, the resolution should not show or require to be set, because resolution on irregular axis is not a fixed value.

For irregular axis what could be added is an "area of validity" or "footprint" for each coordinate that is added that defines the lower and upper bounds of that point. For example if I add a coordinate "2015-01-01", the area of validity might be

cc @KathiSchleidt

KathiSchleidt commented 3 months ago

@baloola think there's something backwards here, when I deselect regular, the Resolutionfields stay while the Lower/Upper Bounds go away. To my understanding its the Resolution fields should go away while the bounds should always be there.

baloola commented 3 months ago

The Resolution should go away when selecting irregular time dimensions, this bug will be fixed.

As for the lower/upper bounds - which corresponds to time's extent- irregular time dimension according to specs should be represented as values ( extent set to null), therefor lower/upper bounds are removed and users should add individual values ( by clicking the + button)

@misev I don't know if there is a way to represent irregular time slots with areas of validity, do you have an example ?

misev commented 3 months ago

@baloola yes I think there's no standardized way currently of representing this concept, you can ignore my suggestion for areas of validity.

baloola commented 3 months ago

The Resolution should go away when selecting irregular time dimensions, this bug will be fixed.

This should be fixed now