ChangeType.update stac_dist/ERA5_global_climate_data/ERA5_global_climate_data.json

FAIRiCUBE / data-requests

Request data to be made available within FAIRiCUBE HUB

2 stars 0 forks source link

ChangeType.update stac_dist/ERA5_global_climate_data/ERA5_global_climate_data.json #272

Open fairicube-data opened 4 months ago

fairicube-data commented 4 months ago

{"filename": "ERA5_global_climate_data/ERA5_global_climate_data.json", "item_type": "stac_dist", "change_type": "Update", "user": "FAiRICUBE", "data_owner": true}

mari-s4e commented 4 months ago

This data request aims at unifying multiple entries about the ERA5 data. It should replace #234, #235, #236, in that this PR refers to the full ERA5 data cube, while the previous ones referred to single dimensions. All dimensions (e.g. temperature, precipitation...) are listed as keywords. @eox-cs1 is is enough or should single Band information be filled out? The data source field points to the source actually used in the process (Google Cloud), while the Provenance fields refer to the data producer (ECMWF). @eox-cs1 is this correct, or should it be the other way around? @Susannaioni does this data request fulfill your use case, too? That is, can it replace also #270 and #271?

Susannaioni commented 4 months ago

Hi @mari-s4e, yes this is good for us. Thank you!

KathiSchleidt commented 4 months ago

@mari-s4e @Susannaioni I just checked against the metadata requirements, here my feedback:

License: this is mandatory, currently we have "other". I tried to see if I can find the Copernicus license in the list for this field, but finally gave up when I noticed how the alphabet loops around, so no chance to find. Created an issue
Owner/Organisation: while you mention ECMWF... in the provenance, I do think they should be mentioned under Organizations (Google Cloud as the provider makes sense under data source). Mussab has suggested adding organization roles, once we have this, we could add ECMWF as originator.
Formally bands are required, but to my view, this API record is an edge case, adding would be overkill, keywords are enough

@baloola is there any way we can manually edit License and Owner/Organisation so we can close this issue while you sort through the other issues listed above?

Susannaioni commented 4 months ago

Hi @KathiSchleidt, when I looked for the license I found that it's the 'creative commons attribution international' license. I don't have the link of the source where I read it now, but I'll have a look tomorrow.

mari-s4e commented 3 months ago

updated md record. @KathiSchleidt is it okay? I added only one band with 2m temperature, because the field is mandatory; other bands are listed as keywords