It's possible that the title is just a typo but it doesn't make any sense in its current format. The description is quite vague and the examples focus only on sequencing and variation data, specifically on file formats. This is a common bias in biomedical data standards.
This entire indicator needs to be revised and widened. It mentions biological data types in half a sentence but doesn't define what it means by this and only refers to file types afterwards.
It's possible that the title is just a typo but it doesn't make any sense in its current format. The description is quite vague and the examples focus only on sequencing and variation data, specifically on file formats. This is a common bias in biomedical data standards.
This entire indicator needs to be revised and widened. It mentions biological data types in half a sentence but doesn't define what it means by this and only refers to file types afterwards.