A project supporting the DRAO application ontology, a hierarchy of specific research domains and descriptors which imports subsets of terms from over 50 publicly-available ontologies.
There should only be one High Throughput Screening
Why are you suggesting this change?
There are two terms with this label.
Additional work on refactoring will be completed (below) when I start the ticket.
Mapping
You should list the old IRI(s) and new IRIs here, together with a short note describing what is happening in the change. This data can be added to development/refactored-IRIs-current.txt
Label
Recommendation: put your recommended class label here
Reasoning: Why this label is your preferred choice. Include any synonyms you think might be appropriate as well.
IRI
Recommendation: The IRI you propose from a reference ontology (e.g. OBI, EFO, AgroPortal...). If you cannot find a class from a reference ontology, please state that you will require DRAO to mint an IRI.
Reasoning: Why this reference ontology / IRI is your preferred choice.
Definition
Either state that you are happy with the definition provided by the reference ontology, or provide your own definition here, with appropriate attribution (e.g. created entirely by you, modified by you from a 3rd party such as the OED or Wikipedia).
Hierarchy
Recommendation: list where in the hierarchy your term should go / which terms its parent(s) should be.
Reasoning: Why this hierarchy is your preferred choice.
What are you changing?
There should only be one High Throughput Screening
Why are you suggesting this change?
There are two terms with this label.
Additional work on refactoring will be completed (below) when I start the ticket.
Mapping
You should list the old IRI(s) and new IRIs here, together with a short note describing what is happening in the change. This data can be added to development/refactored-IRIs-current.txt
Label
Recommendation: put your recommended class label here
Reasoning: Why this label is your preferred choice. Include any synonyms you think might be appropriate as well.
IRI
Recommendation: The IRI you propose from a reference ontology (e.g. OBI, EFO, AgroPortal...). If you cannot find a class from a reference ontology, please state that you will require DRAO to mint an IRI.
Reasoning: Why this reference ontology / IRI is your preferred choice.
Definition
Either state that you are happy with the definition provided by the reference ontology, or provide your own definition here, with appropriate attribution (e.g. created entirely by you, modified by you from a 3rd party such as the OED or Wikipedia).
Hierarchy
Recommendation: list where in the hierarchy your term should go / which terms its parent(s) should be.
Reasoning: Why this hierarchy is your preferred choice.